Caesar Ii Software Cost

Posted on by
Caesar Ii Software Cost 10,0/10 3929 reviews
Caesar II
Developer(s)Impressions Games
Publisher(s)Sierra On-Line
SeriesCity Building
Platform(s)Macintosh, Microsoft Windows, MS-DOS
Release4 September 1995
Genre(s)Strategy
Mode(s)Single-player

CAESAR II offers robust interfacing with CAD-based software, such as CADWorx Plant and Intergraph Smart® suites, using established industry formats (such as PCF and Isogen®), This lets you bring in data from other systems, carry it on to integrating solutions after analysis, and track support IDs throughout the system. You'll save your company money by helping them keep more jobs in-house, provide more accurate cost estimates, and save future re-designs by having a better system from inception. You'll give your company that all-important competitive edge it needs in today's marketplace. Not Just for CAESAR II Users! CAESAR II - Pipe Stress Analysis Summary CAESAR II is the Pipe Stress Analysis standard against which all others are measured and compared. The CAESAR II spreadsheet input technique revolutionized the way piping models are built, modified, and verified. CAESAR II was the first pipe stress program specifically designed for the PC environment.

But that’s not all: As part of our commitment to giving back to our modding community, we recen. Download monster hunter world.

Caesar

Caesar II is a 1995 computer game of the Caesar computer game series that takes place in Ancient Rome. It's the second game in the City Building series.

Gameplay[edit]

When the game begins the Roman empire extends no further than Italy. Players have the opportunity to civilize adjacent barbarianprovinces, eventually reaching the entire Roman Empire at its height. When a province is civilized it unlocks the surrounding provinces. A computerized rival also completes missions both preventing the player from civilizing that province and allowing them to civilize the provinces adjacent to it (the computer has been known to civilize a province it could not have selected when it successfully civilized the last, meaning it is a randomized event, rather than AI). Unlike Caesar III, or Pharaoh, the province and city are separate spheres, as is the military. The player builds primary industry (such as mines or farms), trade facilities (such as roads or docks), and military facilities(such as forts and walls) on one map and builds their city houses, secondary industry (such as wineries or potters), and tertiary industry (such as fire stations, police stations, bath houses) on another (represented as four squares in the center of the provincial map). Also unlike later games walkers are not required to bring services to people, which is instead determined by one buildings distance from another. Invading Armies differ from later games as well, in that Barbarian towns exist within many provinces from which Barbarian armies can emanate. These are converted to Roman towns through invading them and defeating the inhabitants. Most missions require the player to pacify a province and raise the citizens standard of living to a certain level, while neither suffering a military loss, nor losing the emperor's favour, often within a certain time frame. Major factors in city and province-building are housing values and types of housing, unemployment/labour shortages, taxes, wages, deficits, food shortages, military readiness and morale, and imperial demands. The game is won when the player has conquered sufficient provinces to attain the rank of Caesar. The game is lost if the player's computerized rival becomes Caesar, if Caesar removes the player from their post for running too large a deficit, for going beyond the time frame, for failing to follow Imperial demands, or having the city conquered.

Cost

Reception[edit]

Reception
Review scores
PublicationScore
CGW[1]
Next Generation[2]
Computer Games Strategy Plus[3]
MacUser[4]
Computer Game Review94/91/92[5]
PC Entertainment[6]

Initial reception of the game was positive. Arinn Dembo writing for Computer Gaming World gave the game 4 stars.[1] A reviewer for Next Generation deemed it 'an innovative mix of SimCity-type building strategy and wargame campaign.' He said the game's strongest point is how it expands from a city-building simulation into nation-building and wargames, but also highly praised the graphics and simple, easy-to-grasp interface. He scored the game 4 out of 5 stars.[2]

Caesar II was a runner-up for Computer Gaming World's 1995 'Strategy Game of the Year' award, which ultimately went to Command & Conquer and Heroes of Might and Magic (tie). The editors wrote that Caesar II 'surpassed the original with SVGA graphics and an actual combat module', and noted that it 'could have won had the competition not been so strong.'[7]PC Gamer also nominated Caesar II as the best strategy game of 1995, although it lost to Command & Conquer.[8]

Caesar II and its predecessor were named, collectively, the 96th best computer game ever by PC Gamer UK in 1997. The editors wrote, 'Impressions keep on keeping on with the likes of Lords of the Realm [..] but have never managed to regain the dizzy peak they climbed with their handsome brace of think-'em-ups.'[9]

According to Sierra On-Line, combined sales of Caesar and Caesar II surpassed 400,000 units by the end of March 1996.[10]Caesar II alone sold above 500,000 units by late 1998,[11][12] and ultimately reached 2.5 million sales worldwide.[13]

References[edit]

  1. ^ abDembo, Arinn; The Governor's Race: Building Rome Can Make Your Day in Sierra's Caesar II, p. 304. Computer Gaming World, Issue 138, January 1996
  2. ^ ab'Carpe Diem'. Next Generation. No. 14. Imagine Media. February 1996. p. 175.
  3. ^'Caesar II'. Computer Games Strategy Plus. February 9, 1996. Archived from the original on 1997-01-01. Retrieved 2018-11-16.
  4. ^Loyola, Roman (April 1997). 'The Game Room'. MacUser. Archived from the original on 2000-06-04. Retrieved 2018-11-16.
  5. ^Snyder, Frank; Chapman, Ted; Kaiafas, Tasos (December 1995). 'Roman Holiday'. Computer Game Review. Archived from the original on December 21, 1996. Retrieved June 20, 2019.
  6. ^Klett, Steve (January 1996). 'Caesar II'. PC Entertainment. Archived from the original on 1996-10-18. Retrieved 2018-11-16.
  7. ^Staff (June 1996). 'The Computer Gaming World 1996 Premier Awards'. Computer Gaming World (143): 55, 56, 58, 60, 62, 64, 66, 67.
  8. ^Editors of PC Gamer (March 1996). 'The Year's Best Games'. PC Gamer US. 3 (3): 64, 65, 67, 68, 71, 73–75.CS1 maint: extra text: authors list (link)
  9. ^Flynn, James; Owen, Steve; Pierce, Matthew; Davis, Jonathan; Longhurst, Richard (July 1997). 'The PC Gamer Top 100'. PC Gamer UK (45): 51–83.
  10. ^Sierra On-Line Form 10-K (Report). Bellevue, Washington. March 31, 1996. pp. 7–9. Archived from the original on April 16, 2018.
  11. ^Borovskis, Thomas (October 1998). 'Brot und Spiele'. PC Games: 116, 117.
  12. ^https://web.archive.org/web/20020826204215/https://www.golem.de/9808/1566.html
  13. ^https://web.archive.org/web/20160604010733/https://www.companiesmadesimple.com/project/blog/real-business-case-study-david-lester/

External links[edit]

Caesar Ii Load Cases

  • Caesar II at MobyGames

Caesar Ii Software Cost Of Living

Retrieved from 'https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Caesar_II&oldid=915786299'
Posted by5 years ago

Free Caesar Ii Software

Archived

Caesar Ii Software License Price

My office is finally looking at upgrading our stress software from Algor Pipepak (yes, I know we're dinosaurs), and I've been tasked with investigating the options. It seems like the two best candidates are Caesar II and Autopipe. I've been fiddling with the demo version of Caesar, and I'm in the process of getting a demo for Autopipe so I can compare them myself. We mainly work with ASME B31.1 and B31.3.

To cut to the chase, does anyone here have experience with one or both of these programs and perhaps have some opinions to share?

6 comments